Get a short URL
https://sputniknews.com/uk/202105301083032447- British-information-is-believed-in-hole-19-leak-from-Wohan-Laboratory-Reports /
LONDON (Sputnik) – British intelligence officials are investigating the possibility of a SARS-CoV-2 virus leaking from the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China, the Sunday Times reported.
According to the newspaper, British MPs now believe that the leak of the Corona virus is “practical”.
The Daily Mail reported on Saturday that British professor Angus Dalglish and Norwegian scientist Birger Sorensen conducted a study claiming that the SARS-CoV-2 virus was of laboratory origin.
The study claims that Chinese scientists produced SARS-CoV-2 in a Wuhan laboratory, after which they tried to normalize “deliberate destruction, concealment or contamination of data” by transmitting it through bats. Becomes. Beijing has repeatedly denied such allegations.
In January, international experts traveled to Wuhan, where they surveyed laboratories, hospitals and markets to find the sources of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. The World Health Organization (WHO) specialized mission then prepared a report and said: “Corona virus leakage from Wuhan laboratory is very unlikely.” The report, released in March, said the new virus was most likely transmitted to humans through bats through an intermediate host.
Following the publication, WHO President Teaching Adnanom Gabrizos said that China Data was denied International experts visit the Chinese city of Wuhan, where SARS-CoV-2 is expected to launch in November 2019. The United States and 13 other countries have jointly expressed their concerns about the WHO report, which did not include complete data and samples.
Earlier this week, US President Biden ordered The intelligence community will redouble its efforts to investigate the origins of the new corona virus and report its findings to it within 90 days.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed within this article are the personal opinions of the author. The facts and opinions appearing in the article do not reflect the views of knews.uk and knews.uk does not assume any responsibility or liability for the same.